| David
F. Velkoff, M.D.
Medical Director, Drake Institute of Behavioral Medicine, Los
Angeles
YES
In
my own practice, I’ve used neurofeedback in a comprehensive
medical treatment program to help more than 1,000 patients with
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. When combined with
supportive therapies such as family counseling and educational
therapy, EEG neurofeedback is the most effective treatment available.
ADHD
is usually caused by underarousal. EEG studies of patients show
excessive slow waves at rest or during cognitive challenge,
or both. Some of these patients may have decreased dopamine
receptors in the brain. Faster brainwaves are associated with
dopamine and increased cerebral blood flow, which is associated
with improved concentration.
Methylphenidate
(Ritalin, Novartis), a stimulant, has the paradoxical effect
of reducing hyperactivity. It probably does so by increasing
arousal, which also turns up impulse control and improves concentration.
Training patients to suppress slow waves and increase the fast
brain waves associated with concentration teaches them to do
the same thing.
In
one of the earliest studies of neurofeedback for ADHD, Dr. Joel
Lubar of the University of Tennessee showed that training children
to suppress slow waves and increase fast brain waves improved
concentration and behavior, and that subsequently training them
to produce slow waves caused problems to return. Larger studies
have confirmed the neurofeedback’s efficacy.
Critics
of EEG neurofeedback hold this treatment to more rigid standards
than drug treatments. Yet unlike drugs, neurofeedback is benign.
I’ve seen adolescents who took stimulant drugs for years
become physically stunted, or they develop hypertension or disturbing
personality changes probably not part of ADHD.
|
Russell
Barkley, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychiatry and Neurology, University of Massachusetts
Medical Center
NO
Data
supporting this treatment are thin. All the studies with positive
results suffer from small size, poor methodology, or both. Overall,
the results have been mixed.
There
has been little since Dr. Lubar’s 20-year-old study to
back up his findings of improvements in behavior and attention
after biofeedback for four children.
In
a small study in the early 1990s, Dr. Michael Linden of San
Juan Capistrano, Calif., randomly assigned some children to
biofeedback and left others out. Dr. Linden, a biofeedback advocate,
found no effect on hyperactivity or impulsiveness, and a very
mild effect on attentiveness.
Yet
Dr. Linden’s study had major flaws. It was unblinded and
included no placebo controls, and the children’s parents
were paying for the treatment. Another study showed no benefit
from biofeedback for ADD.
Dr.
Aubrey Fine, a psychologist in San Francisco, found virtually
no difference in outcomes between two groups of children, one
getting biofeedback and the other playing computer games designed
to improve attention in patients with head injuries. Several
other small studies have had the same dismal results.
Though
he’s presented no data to back it up, Dr. Lubar says that
the effects of biofeedback last into adulthood. Yet the medical
literature shows no follow-up studies of biofeedback for ADD.
Proponents
want credibility but they don’t want to do the intellectual
heavy lifting required in real science. I debated one proponent
on network television who said he was too busy saving children’s
lives to do research. That, he said, was up to academics like
me. Apostolic attitudes like that should raise one’s suspicions.
|